Four disciplines. One team that owns the outcome.
Design, engineering, mobile, and accessibility under one roof. No handoff gap between the people who draw it and the people who ship it, and no one to point at when something isn't usable.
Research
Interviews, usability testing, and journey maps that surface what users actually need.
Flows & IA
Structure for dense, permission-heavy products that has to survive real workflows.
Interface design
High-fidelity UI across every state and edge case, contrast and focus order included.
Design systems
Component libraries with accessible behavior baked into the primitives.
Web applications
React and TypeScript front ends wired to the APIs your team already runs.
Marketing sites
Fast, editable sites that hold up on procurement review and on mobile data.
CMS & integrations
WordPress and headless builds with authoring models editors don't fight.
Front-end rescue
Performance, semantics, and keyboard behavior repaired on code you already own.
Conformance audits
WCAG 2.2 and Section 508 testing by hand with assistive tech, not just a scanner.
Remediation
Prioritized, engineering-led fixes on your codebase, then retested to verify.
VPATs & ACRs
Defensible conformance reports written by the people who ran the tests.
Expert witness
Conformance analysis, expert reports, deposition, and trial testimony.
Native & cross-platform
Swift, Kotlin, or React Native, chosen for your team's ability to maintain it.
Companion experiences
Mobile that shares a design system and a data model with your web product.
AT testing
VoiceOver and TalkBack passes on real devices before every release.
Release & support
Store submission, review response, and a maintenance cadence after launch.
Accessibility isn't a fifth service. It's in all four.
Whatever you hire us for, the deliverable is conformant when it lands. We hold that bar so consistently that courts call on us as expert witnesses.
In design
Contrast, focus order, and error handling decided in the wireframe, not patched later.
In code
Semantic markup, real focus management, and AT checks in the pull request.
On paper
VPATs and ACRs your procurement team can hand over without a caveat.
Under oath
Retained in ADA and 508 litigation for analysis, deposition, and testimony.
Same four steps, whatever we're building.
Scope
A working session, a written plan, and a clear time-and-materials estimate before anyone opens a file.
Design
Flows and interfaces reviewed with you every week. No month-long silences.
Build
Shipped in increments you can click, in a repo your engineers have access to.
Verify
Accessibility testing, documentation, and a handoff your team can carry forward.
Ways to work with us
Most engagements start as one of these three and change shape as the work does. A product is never really finished, so we tend to stick around; a lot of the teams we launched with on day one are still partners now.
Defined-scope project
A clearly scoped outcome, whether a redesign, a new product, or a site rebuild, with a time-and-materials estimate up front.
Best when the destination is clear.Embedded team
A monthly retainer of design and engineering capacity inside your rituals and your backlog.
Best when the roadmap keeps moving.Audit & remediation
A conformance audit, a prioritized fix plan, and documentation, on a product you already run.
Best when there's a deadline or a demand letter.Questions clients ask first
Something not covered here? Ask us directly.
Usually we do. We can hand off a documented system and support your team through implementation, or work in your repo alongside them, whichever gets the product out faster.
Not usually. Accessibility is a core part of how we work, so we build it in by default and aim to ship everything conformant. When a project's budget won't stretch to full accessibility, we get it as far as we responsibly can, and we tell you plainly what isn't accessible and why, so it's never a surprise. You'd hire the accessibility practice on its own mainly for products we didn't build, or for formal documentation and litigation support.
We've been through it with universities, foundations, and enterprise vendors since 2014: RFP responses, security review, insurance certificates, and conformance documentation included.
For now, all of our contracts are time-and-materials, billed against our GSA Schedule rates. Every hourly labor category we staff is a GSA-scheduled rate. What an engagement costs depends on its scope and the mix of people it needs, which we map out with you before anything starts.